Author Topic: Ongoing Statistics  (Read 53243 times)

De-Legro

  • M&F Dev Team
  • Sr. Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3144
  • Karma: +105/-55
    • View Profile
Re: Ongoing Statistics
« Reply #165 on: April 07, 2015, 09:52:39 AM »
Not at this time, but I plan to add options later.

If you absolutely need to get rid of them, sending your estate into starvation intentionally for a short time will reduce thrall population stronger than peasant population, and when you bring food supply back, peasant population will recover faster.


So far with my test settlement, I have lost peasants but not a single thrall has died.
He who was once known as Blackfyre

Tom

  • Head Developer
  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6320
  • Karma: +102/-15
    • View Profile
    • Might & Fealty
Re: Ongoing Statistics
« Reply #166 on: April 07, 2015, 11:42:59 PM »
So far with my test settlement, I have lost peasants but not a single thrall has died.

If you have a low number of thralls, that might be the result of rounding artifacts.

De-Legro

  • M&F Dev Team
  • Sr. Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3144
  • Karma: +105/-55
    • View Profile
Re: Ongoing Statistics
« Reply #167 on: April 07, 2015, 11:56:48 PM »
If you have a low number of thralls, that might be the result of rounding artifacts.


Only 126 Thralls in a population of 1143. Once things in the settlement stablise I am going to start experimenting again and keep records of what is going on.
He who was once known as Blackfyre

Tom

  • Head Developer
  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6320
  • Karma: +102/-15
    • View Profile
    • Might & Fealty
Re: Ongoing Statistics
« Reply #168 on: April 09, 2015, 12:40:39 AM »
Only 126 Thralls in a population of 1143.

That isn't low. Rounding artifacts can come into play when you have 10 or 20 thralls (say the code determines that 3% of the thrall population should starve - that is 0.3 of 10, so it gets rounded down to zero, but if you have 1000 peasants, you will lose 30, so it would seem like peasants die more than thralls).

Roran Hawkins

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 799
  • Karma: +37/-20
  • "He whose thread shall not be flamed."
    • View Profile
Re: Ongoing Statistics
« Reply #169 on: July 07, 2015, 10:41:34 AM »
When will we see a new statistic? I'd like to see a new version of this tbh!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lRggDInCOhI


Otherwise a thrall % population map so we can see which region has the most % of thralls and which realms have a lot/few of them.
The story of Ascalon's forum threads.
Founder of Ascalon, professional whiner, minor storyteller.

Tom

  • Head Developer
  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6320
  • Karma: +102/-15
    • View Profile
    • Might & Fealty
Re: Ongoing Statistics
« Reply #170 on: July 07, 2015, 05:01:51 PM »
I'm incredibly low on time right now, but I like the thrall % map, I'll probably do it just for my own enjoyment.

Roran Hawkins

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 799
  • Karma: +37/-20
  • "He whose thread shall not be flamed."
    • View Profile
Re: Ongoing Statistics
« Reply #171 on: August 15, 2015, 07:49:19 PM »
Hmm, I just had an idea. How about about a heatmap displaying the amount of messages sent geographically? If you can make such a heatmap, that'd be an interesting way to find out howmuch communication is handled in-game, and thus, how active inter-player communication at different locations is.
« Last Edit: August 15, 2015, 07:50:51 PM by Roran Hawkins »
The story of Ascalon's forum threads.
Founder of Ascalon, professional whiner, minor storyteller.

Ratharing

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 505
  • Karma: +25/-12
    • View Profile
Re: Ongoing Statistics
« Reply #172 on: August 15, 2015, 08:02:41 PM »
That would be fantastic, really.

Tom

  • Head Developer
  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6320
  • Karma: +102/-15
    • View Profile
    • Might & Fealty
Re: Ongoing Statistics
« Reply #173 on: August 15, 2015, 10:04:02 PM »
That is very hard to make. Messages don't have location information. So it would have to be based on the senders, but I only have their current location, not the location when they sent the message. So to be somewhat accurate, it would have to include only the recent past, but then it's not entirely truthful because many realms have phases of high and low activity.

Weaver

  • Guest
Re: Ongoing Statistics
« Reply #174 on: August 15, 2015, 10:13:09 PM »
Maybe a heat map based on the settlements/subrealm owned by the sender, to the estates/subrealm of the receiver would work?

Stonedman

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 679
  • Karma: +19/-65
    • View Profile
Re: Ongoing Statistics
« Reply #175 on: August 15, 2015, 11:00:31 PM »
i'l like to see a troop / First one concentration map :)

De-Legro

  • M&F Dev Team
  • Sr. Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3144
  • Karma: +105/-55
    • View Profile
Re: Ongoing Statistics
« Reply #176 on: August 16, 2015, 12:59:33 AM »
i'l like to see a troop / First one concentration map :)

With the number of people who would abuse that OOC I don't think it is a good idea.
He who was once known as Blackfyre

Tweeznax

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 339
  • Karma: +11/-0
    • View Profile
Re: Ongoing Statistics
« Reply #177 on: August 16, 2015, 01:25:05 AM »
With the number of people who would abuse that OOC I don't think it is a good idea.

Yes, this is definitely not the kind of info that needs to be made public. Half the realms on the map would suddenly swallow their neighbor!

WVH

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 299
  • Karma: +20/-47
    • View Profile
Re: Ongoing Statistics
« Reply #178 on: September 30, 2015, 11:17:09 PM »
It would be cool to see some of the older stats revisited to see a comparison.  It has been a long time sense we had any really neat stuff in here.

Tom

  • Head Developer
  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6320
  • Karma: +102/-15
    • View Profile
    • Might & Fealty
Re: Ongoing Statistics
« Reply #179 on: October 01, 2015, 09:23:59 AM »
True. What are you looking for, specifically?